Posted by
Becca
In:
Book Review,
My Life
Twilight
It was Friday night when I broke.
I was sitting at my parent's dining room table eating homemade pizza. Innocent enough, until I opened my mouth. "Mom," I said, "I feel like I need to at least watch Twilight. I've spent too long mocking it without having read the book or seen the movie."
Conveniently, Mom just so happened to have the flick in the house.
So it came to be that I watched Twilight.
I promptly went out and bought the first book the next day.
It was hard for me to admit that I had actually enjoyed this immensely popular teen fiction. When I want to read about vampires, I pick up Laurell K. Hamilton or something similar. I'll have blood, sex, death, sadomasochism, and badass chicks with my supernatural fiction, please. But there was something about the simplicity of the story that captured my attention (and I'm a sucker for a vampire romance... no pun intended).
However, I do have several major issues.
I'm no stranger to Stephanie Meyer - I read and enjoyed The Host, though I thought her origins as a young adult author clung too heavily to her "adult" novel. It had the potential to be truly excellent, but skirted too many deeper issues for me to say more than 'The Host really held my attention, and it could have been really good." I felt similarly about Twilight. The writing felt clumsy and clearly aimed towards young teen girls, yet there were a few moments when it really shone.
I have another problem with the book. Bella bores me. I mean, she bores me to tears. The elements of her character that make her interesting and likeable were completely clouded by her obsession with Edward. Instead of granting her some semblance of independence, Meyer took her protagonist and viciously wrung out all trace of character, leaving her limp as a wet dishrag. And oh my God the teenager angst. I have so little patience with it!
Oh, and can we talk about stalker Edward? Yes, teenage girls, it's romantic to have some guy trespass into your home and watch you sleep.
Yikes.
A quick comment about the film - I thought it was terrible. There's just no getting around it. Robert Pattinson was lovely and actually very good, but the special effects were atrocious, much of the acting was wooden, and the script was painful.
All that harsh criticism aside, the simple truth remains that I did enjoy it - both book and movie. But I enjoyed it in a hey, that was kind of fun sort of way, not in a OMG I love Twilight, it's SO GOOD! kind of way. I feel no pressing urge to run out and get the second book. I feel no thrill of excitement contemplating the release of the next movie. I'm left with that wanting more feeling - not wanting more of the story, just wanting more substance to the story.
I guess what I really want are more adult, interesting characters, and a more adult, interesting romance.
This is why I shouldn't be allowed to read teen fiction.
This entry was posted on Monday, March 30, 2009
and is filed under
Book Review
,
My Life
.
You can follow any responses to this entry through
the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response,
or trackback from your own site.
Posted on
-
8 Comments
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
It will be interesting to see if they ever make a movie from the Laurell K. Hamilton books.... I could see the earlier books, but the later would all be NC-17...
??? Haven't seen the Twilight. Don't intend to. I get it, but then I really don't//kinda skipped from elementary reading to Stephen King and then onward into a lot of Adult Fiction stuff. The only deviation has been the Harry Potter series which I think everyone should read. Movies - eh. Books - Fo Sho!
Ruh roh, my dog is attacking me!
Ummm . . . "just so happened to have the flick in the house"? You might want to remind readers that you have a 12 yr. old sister and she's the one who demanded the film. While I admit to some swooning fandom (HELLO, Clive Owen!), I'm not one of the 40-something women who besiege the boy (Robert something - Patterson??) begging for him to bite their neck. (Talk about "yikes"!)
As a mother of girls, seriously? This book series has *so* much that is worrisome. I haven't read the second one yet, but Susannah was filling me in a bit because, even at 12, she was disturbed by the book. If I understood her correctly, Edward apparently puts Bella (BTW, totally agree with you about the annoyance factor with this character. She should have been so much more fleshed out) under some type of house arrest and tries to keep her from seeing Jacob. To desensitize girls to possesive, absusive behavior is unconscionable to me.
Sorry - I'll try not to take up too much space in the future with comments. I'll need to write my own blog entry on this one. : )
Thank you for further solidifying my non-urge to read this overly obsessed over book much less shell out $20 for it or to rent the movie.
I'll wait till i can get a free or nearly free version of the book, then borrow the movie from someone.
At least Harry Potter was humorous not teenage agnst from sorely misguided children who still think like children.
Hear hear for wanting deep, convoluted, substantial characters.
I feel you - Robert Pattinson, while not as good looking as Brad Pitt, does sort of fascinate me. i think it's the brooding male protagonist. I think it's the particular shape of his lips, the way his voice sounds and the way he stands. I just can't figure out the X factor. I DID enjoy, but you read my review! Bella is weak and pathetic and Edward is beautiful but slightly stalkerish and abusive.
I'm glad you enjoyed it! It's never been books that make you THINK but it does grab one's attention.
I loved the books and the movie, but then again you know that already. I just hope with the bigger budget they don't bungle the second movie.
@Oats: I think it would be hopeless to try to make a movie out of the later Hamilton books. Not only would they gain an NC-17 rating, but there's no story! Just sex! As much as I enjoy Hamilton's writing, I miss the days when we had serial killer plots to go along with our random orgies. ^_^
@Mom: Wow, Edward gets WORSE? No wonder you didn't want Susannah reading those...
@Firefly Haven: I think it's so funny that I truly despise everything to do with Harry Potter, yet actually found myself enjoying Twilight. There's no question as to which of the series is better written (Rowling's, of course), but I have this irrational hatred for it.
@Kat: All this talk of Brad Pitt and vampires is making me want to ditch work and go watch Interview with a Vampire again. ^_^
@Sleepyjane: It most definitely does grab one's attention! And I can't stress enough that even though I have issues with it, I did enjoy it. AND from what I understand, they've ditched the director of the first film and have replaced her with Chris Weitz, who directed The Golden Compass. That was a fantastic movie, so I have high hopes for New Moon. ^_^
Okay--so not technically about Twilight, but my comment *is* about a book : ) Today at B&N I saw the book "Zombie Survival Guide" and if you don't already own it, you *seriously* need to! Because you just. never. know.
P.S. Can you use your considerable influence to get your mom to *write something* already?????
I agree 100%. If you think Bella is boring, you should see her in book 2.
xoxo, SG
Post a Comment